Email this page to your friend:

Will the UAW finally get its chance to organize the imports? That’s what union boss Ron Gettelfinger is counting on as Toyota takes a rare misstep that has apparently angered workers at its expanding network of plants across the U.S.
Perhaps you’ve seen the latest Toyota commercial, the homey tale told by a folksy announcer, bragging about the plants the automaker has set up and which now employ tens of thousands of workers. Those plants pay good wages, especially in the South where those employees were often making lower wages until Toyota came along. Perhaps too good, the Japanese maker is starting to wonder.
Kudos to the Detroit Free Press which, last month, uncovered a secret company document underscoring the need to hold down labor costs. Where Toyota – and most of its import rivals – wages are currently pegged to what Detroit’s automakers pay, that could change dramatically, with individual Toyota plants paying, in the future, pegged to what workers make in lower-wage states like Mississippi.
Japanese makers have long argued workers don’t need unions to represent their interests, and as long as companies like Toyota continued matching Detroit, there was no real interest. Union drives at places like Nissan, in Smyrna, Tenn., and at Honda’s big operations in Ohio, were routinely beaten back. But this time, “There is a lot of interest,” Gettelfinger told reporters following a two-day UAW conference. But he quickly added that, “I won’t say that there’s enough interest to hold an election.”
The last thing the UAW needs is to march off to another defeat. There was a time when several million men and women paid their dues to the UAW. Today, the membership rolls are down by nearly three-quarters from that peak, even with the union spreading out and organizing other fields, including nurses and university workers. Even among the faithful following at Ford, GM and Chrysler, there are growing doubts about the relevancy of a labor movement that is being forced to retreat on benefits like healthcare that took decades for workers to win.
There are those who believe the Japanese – and Germans and Koreans – will never permit unions in their U.S. plants (with the exception of a few joint venture operations, like the GM/Toyota factory, known as NUMMI, near San Francisco). But as the number of transplants grows, as workers age, costs rise, sales occasionally stumble and manufacturers face the challenge of maintaining costs, they start taking steps that can anger the workforce. And sooner or later, the UAW is hoping, (praying?), the doors to unionization will open. Opportunity or delusion? We’ll have to wait and see.
The Detroit Free Press on the UAW
RSS
Send Feedback!





2 Responses to “Opportunity—or Delusion?—At the UAW”
Everett Rupert
March 30th, 2007 - 12:30 amThe union movement needs to re-energize, and they’ve been handed nuclear power with the transplant auto makers ‘ plans to vary wages based on local conditions, the very thing that will cause the South to rise on UAW wings.
Most Americans realize that when pay cuts are afoot, besides morale,the only other thing in their lives that goes down is salary. Mortgage companies don’t automatically cut you a break, the car payment doesn’t decrease, and the food store certainly doesn’t give you an extra bag of
Cheetoes to help make up for your loss.
I would advise the UAW not to fumble the advantage by saddling the future converts with bureaucratic red tape and shenanigans that have many locals looking and acting more like mamagement; remember the Animal Farm example.
Want to read more from Everett Rupert? Check ouit the website http://www.EverettRupert.com.
Jason Zebersky
March 31st, 2007 - 12:02 pmDelusion? NO
Oportunity? YES
Definitly an EVENTUALITY, human nature do’snt change over time.
Politics just go through cycles, even if the original US automakers go out of bussiness and the original UAW and TEAMSTERS disband; workers will oganize to promote their intrest in the future as in the past.
Flawed as it may be it’s the American way, countervailing forces woring toward a solution in the middle; like our two party political system, the courts with the Plaintif Vs Defendant.
Submit Comment