Email this page to your friend:
U.S. motor vehicles fell a hefty 6.9 percent in April, compared to year-ago numbers, and domestic manufacturers were clearly hit hardest, with Chrysler down 23.5 percent, GM off 16.2 percent, and Ford down 12.1 percent. “The reason for the takedown,” complained Mark Laneve, GM’s sales and marketing chief, is “rising oil prices.”
The impact of $120-a-barrel petroleum is, not surprisingly, being felt most acutely on the truck side of the industry’s sales charts. Including SUVs, pickups, vans, and minivans, light truck volume was off a whopping 17.4 percent for the month. And even the imports couldn’t avoid the pain. Toyota is suffering a sharp decline in demand for its Tundra pickup, for example, despite hefty incentives.
But the Japanese giant actually managed to gain ground during the downfall, its overall sales numbers up 3.4 percent for April, while its rival, Nissan, reported a 6.7 percent increase in sales, despite sluggish demand for truck models like the Titan pickup and Armada SUV. Why? Simple. The long-running truck boom appears to be over, and American motorists are, in ever-increasing numbers, migrating back to passenger cars and car-based crossovers. Industry numbers suggest that passenger car sales actually rose 5.2 percent in April, and the trend seems certain to continue, at least as long as consumers fear further fuel price increases.
Try our new homepage
Forums
RSS






2 Responses to “Shifting Sales Slam Big Three”
Dave
May 12th, 2008 - 3:57 pm“The reason for the takedown,” complained Mark Laneve, GM’s sales and marketing chief, is “rising oil prices.”
Wrong answer, Mark. Please explain why the JOEMs all saw increases!? Maybe your product line up is to blame??? I feel sorry for people buying Cobalts…you can get a cheaper car by taking the fridge box sitting on the side of the road and putting 4 wheels on it…just like a Cobalt but cheaper.
LISA
May 13th, 2008 - 7:12 amCARGUIDE1.COM IS A GREAT WAY TO FIND A USED CAR
Submit Comment