First Drive: 2010 BMW ActiveHybrid X6
Green
Trucks
Luxury
Family
Brand
Muscle
See more sites from  HighGear  M E D I A  >>

Dodge Sticking with Small Diesel for New Ram

Dodge Sticking with Small Diesel for New Ram

By Colin Mathews's avatar Colin MathewsColin Mathews December 19th, 2008

2009 Dodge Ram

2009 Dodge Ram

Enlarge Photo

This quote from pickuptrucks.com makes my oil-burning heart beat just a little bit faster: "Slow truck sales, the fact that diesel fuel still costs more than gasoline, and tougher emissions standards driving costs up won’t stop Chrysler from offering a light-duty diesel engine in the Dodge Ram 1500."

That's a bold move from a company shuttering its entire production infrastructure for one month, but I think it's a smart move. And not just because I'm a diesel nut. It could also give the Ram a distinct edge over half-tons made by Toyota and Ford, both of whom have put their light-duty diesel engine projects on hold.

Just like GM doing the right thing and spending more on powertrain technology like direct-injection for its new vehicles when port fuel injection would do just fine, thank you very much, Chrysler's commitment to continue development of its small diesel is one that could end up paying dividends. Truck guys know the benefits of diesel well, and legions of Ram owners are maniacally devoted to their Cummins turbo diesel inline-sixes. The pump has been primed, and the truck world is eagerly awaiting the new baby Cummins, which is rumored to be a V-8 of around 5.0 liters. Chrysler may be a bit bloodied up, but it's staying to fight another round, and with the excellent new Ram pickup propelled by a miserly, torquey diesel in its corner, perhaps fortunes will start to turn around.

It's just a shame Chrysler doesn't have this engine in the here and now; the North American Truck of the Year competition between the Ram and the F-150 would be that much better if it were. 2009 Dodge RamEnlarge PhotoThis quote from pickuptrucks.com makes my oil-burning heart beat just a little bit faster: "Slow truck sales, the fact that diesel fuel still costs more than gasoline, and tougher emissions standards driving costs up won’t stop Chrysler from offering a light-duty diesel engine in the Dodge Ram 1500." That's a bold move from a company shuttering its entire production infrastructure for one month, but I think it's a smart move. And not just because I'm a diesel nut. It could also give the Ram a distinct edge over half-tons made by Toyota and Ford, both of whom have put their light-duty diesel engine projects on hold. Just like GM doing the right thing and spending more on powertrain technology like direct-injection for its new vehicles when port fuel injection would do just fine, thank you very much, Chrysler's commitment to continue development of its small diesel is one that could end up paying dividends. Truck guys know the benefits of diesel well, and legions of Ram owners are maniacally devoted to their Cummins turbo diesel inline-sixes. The pump has been primed, and the truck world is eagerly awaiting the new baby Cummins, which is rumored to be a V-8 of around 5.0 liters. Chrysler may be a bit bloodied up, but it's staying to fight another round, and with the excellent new Ram pickup propelled by a miserly, torquey diesel in its corner, perhaps fortunes will start to turn around. It's just a shame Chrysler doesn't have this engine in the here and now; the North American Truck of the Year competition between the Ram and the F-150 would be that much better if it were.

Tags: North America, Pickups, Industry, Enthusiasts

Posted in: Chrysler, Dodge, Diesel



More News


More From Around High Gear Media


Responses (3 total)

  1. By Reece #1, Posted: 12/19/2008

    A 5 litre V8 is a small diesel? So what does that make a vw 4 cylinder common rail diesel?
    Another good move, trucks and large SUV's really should be deisel powered and once they become more popular the price differential is likey to reduce.
    Think this is too late to save Chrysler brands though.

  2. By  colin #2, Posted: 12/19/2008

    Hey Reece - yeah, 5.0-liters is definitely smaller than the current 6.7-liter cummins. No, it definitely isn't diminutive, but the new engine will have a number of things going for it in the fuel efficiency realm compared with the cummins six. First, a shorter, lighter crankshaft than the six will help things out, plus a clean-sheet design should be another boon to economy. I wish I knew details about this engine, but if you take a look at what GM is doing with its new Baby Duramax (http://blogs.thecarconnection.com/blogs/marty_blog/2008/charles-kettering-is-alive-and-well/), you get an idea of the high-tech wonders employed in the newest diesels to improve mpg.

  3. By JKD #3, Posted: 12/19/2008

    Is Isuzu still involved in Duramax R&D or is it all GM now?

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy